![]() |
BACKGROUND PAGE | ![]() |
![]() |
Below you will find general biographical and historical information about the varoius philosophers |
||||
Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) Hobbes continued with the Filmerian tradition by arguing that a distinct relationship exists between the state and the family, that in essence the family is the state writ small. To Hobbes, as with Robert Filmer, who wrote in the late sixteenth century, husbands rule their homes like minature monarchs; their power is absolute. According to this theory, if subjects have the right to rebel against their monarch, then women and children would have the same right to rebel against their husbands and parents, respectively. The Roundheads could never offer an argument that effectively challenged this assertion. It would take another philosopher, John Locke, to finally be able to break the assumed relationship between state and family, thus allowing for the subjects' right to rebel. |
Background Information for Thomas Hobbes: Thomas Hobbes wrote LEVIATHAN during a time of political turmoil in England. During the 1640's England experienced a Civil War between Royalists, those that supported the king, and Roundheads, those that suppported Parliament. The English Civil War resulted in England's king, Charles I, a Stuart, losing his head and England being ruled by Parliament, under Oliver Cromwell, from 1649 through 1660 (note, however, that Cromwell died in 1658). This period (1649-1660) is known as the Interregnum and ended when Charles II was restored to the throne in 1660. It was during the Interregnum that Hobbes wrote LEVIATHAN in order to argue the need for absolute government. Hobbes had not been in favor of the Parliament's seizing of power and felt that the chaos brought about by the civil war was too destructive and unsettling. In order to defend his position, Hobbes uses his understanding of man's existence in the State of Nature and Social Contract theory, making him the first philosopher to examine these themes in any great detail. The State of Nature is man's existence in an environment without any government. Due to a variety of reasons, primarily dependent on which philosopher is examining man's state in this environment, man will enter into a social contract; this is the creation of government. Government derives its power from the people; however, according to Hobbes that power is absolute and cannot be overthrown. If you choose Hobbes you will read excerpts from LEVIATHAN. Before reading the excerpts, however, you may wish to think about what the title of the work reveals about Hobbes' poltical views. You may wish to examine the Book of Job in the Bible, Chapters 40 and 41. |
|||
Background Information for John Locke: Background Information for Jean-Jacques Rousseau: |
![]() John Locke (1632-1704) John Locke was able to do what the Roundheads were unable to do during the English Civil War (1640's); Locke successfully defended the right to rebel. He was successful primarily because he broke from the Filmerian/Hobbesian tradition of claiming that the state and family were intricately linked. Such a connection made it difficult for the Roundheads to justify their civil war because if the family is a microcosm of the state, then reason dictates that if subjects have a right to rebel then women and children have the same right to rebel against their husbands and parents, respectively; this was something the Roundheads could not accept. Locke is the first theorist to break the connection between state and family. By arguing that the state and the family are not related, he is able to justify the right to rebel against government without advocating the same right for women and children. Locke does, however, admit that in some cases women do have the right to rebel against their husbands, especially if thier lives are threatened. |
|||
![]() Jean-Jacque Rousseau (1712-1778) Rousseau makes a clear break with Hobbes and Locke in that he views man as being inherently good. To Rousseau, man naturally wants to help his fellow man. Such a view leads Rousseau to construct a vastly different existence for man in the state of nature and a different motivation for man to enter into a social contract. |